Songs/artists/record labels NOT to upload (COPYRIGHT LIST)

Moonightcore · Post by **Moonightcore** » September 17th, 2011, 4:33 pm

I will post the songs I get copyright and the label.
Moonightcore:
1º Nightcore - Party Boy >> Rassada Music
2º Nightcore - Love is (a Suicide) >> UMG
3º Nightcore - Nobody Loves Me (Bella's Version) >> UltraRecords

Moonitechno:
1º Nightcore - Wonderland II >> UMG
_______________________________________
That's it for the moment xD

Website · Post by **Raver** » September 17th, 2011, 7:37 pm

Thank you for the information. ._.

Oil in Gulf · Post by **Oil in Gulf** » September 28th, 2011, 12:28 am

LeonHup's account got strikes from Octone, WEA, and Hard2Beat. I've never heard of those record labels.

Post by **Kirby** » September 28th, 2011, 12:48 am

Lots of new labels popping up lately.

Also, guys, whatever you do, DO NOT DISPUTE COPYRIGHT CLAIMS. If you don't own the rights to the material, you will not win no matter what the circumstance. My friend tried to do it recently for a strike she received. She later got an e-mail saying that a court order had been filed to restrain her from infringing activity. Had she not been hiding behind 20 proxies, she would have been FUBAR.

Even if claims look suspicious/fake, leave them. Even if you think you can win under fair use, leave it. There's a good chance the judge won't agree with you on that one.

Suck it up and deal with it, it's better to lose a YouTube account than to lose your life.

Gls · Post by **Gls** » October 3rd, 2011, 9:23 am

I shall be more careful for now. Thanks for the info.

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » October 4th, 2011, 3:28 pm

So I just got my third copyright strike -.- from AATW . Unfortunatelly I cant find out what song/s they exactly deleted but looking at their artist list it looks really bad:
http://www.aatw.com/artist.php

Kitashi · Post by **Kitashi** » October 4th, 2011, 7:58 pm

Hoo boy, I do have a load of things to contribute here. My parents are close friends with people who work in the recording industry, so yeah.

Let me tell you guys, the recording industry is very complicated. More often than not, it's pretty gosh darned cruel and unfair. I learned that many, many labels have signed artists that aren't documented on the Internet at all, so much that the usefulness of this thread is somewhat questionable. There are so many labels that don't have/never update their websites; when you think about it, not many people have much reason to go to the websites of artists or their labels, so they wouldn't see a reason to. Sites such as Discogs are built solely on user-contribution frameworks and can be quite unreliable.

Over the years record labels have been increasingly taking measures to crack down on Internet piracy. Nowadays, labels do often work collaboratively to take down mass infringing material in the most cost-efficient ways possible, which means filing copyright claims simultaneously. Yes, they do target specific YouTube users, and yes, they do contact other labels if they notice that their copyright is being infringed.
There are some labels that do decide to get up close and personal, but the majority do not. They won't even bother to look at any buy links or disclaimers you may have put in your description.

Also, labels aren't usually uniform bodies, especially larger ones. If one person from a label says that uploading a song is okay, another person they work with may not, and take action to remove the video. They don't keep a track of those things. In addition, labels have rights to take down remixes or alternate versions of their songs, including those which are freely available. In these cases, those versions were unauthorized.

Like Kirby said earlier, you should never try to counter any copyright claims. It is absolutely required by YouTube and law that you own all rights to the content that was taken down when filing a counterlclaim. If you do not, that will be used in court against you. YouTube has taken several measures to decrease the likelihood of false copyright claims, and even if fake claims still get through, trolls could very easily forward you organizations to like the RIAA.
Fair use is a defense, not a right. It is only useful if you actually go to court and it is ruled to be in your favor, and useless if you just post it into a silly video description or counterclaim.

This advice will probably be hard to swallow coming from a newbie like me. I could understand if it only happens once a year or something, but if your channels are constantly getting removed by copyright strikes, you should really be finding something else better to do with your time. Although uploading songs on YouTube may make you happy, it provides no benefit to you at all in the real world. Considering how all the hard work and dedication put into your channels can be taken down forever in less than a day, I really don't see how it is worth it. But that's just me.

Gls · Post by **Gls** » October 4th, 2011, 8:46 pm

Absolutely agree with you, Kitashi. I've some of my videos which matched the content ID. Just hope I won't get my first copyright strike.

And also. Speaking of court, it somehow reminds me of Phoenix Wright. xD

Alright, back to topic.

Website · Post by **Johannez691** » October 12th, 2011, 6:40 am

My first copyright strike:

Artist: Martin Solveig
Title: Big In Japan
Genre: House
My video: House - Big In Japan

Removed due to a copyright claim by: UMG

jordesu · Post by **jordesu** » October 12th, 2011, 12:44 pm

Just like Grizz said. AATW have decided to be fuckin' assholes and gave me a sanction on "Paradise & Dreams" (Ultrabeat)

Kitashi · Post by **Kitashi** » October 19th, 2011, 12:29 am

Apparently record labels that find the YouTube channels of people who upload copyrighted music now notify other record labels that own content on that channel, causing some channels to be taken down VERY quickly.
That seems to be what has just happened to jordesuu. :-/

Guest · Post by **Guest** » October 22nd, 2011, 1:45 am

AATW just took down 10 of my videos in one go plz excuse my language but #@$% them
better hurry and take down your AATW videos before they find your channel

Guest · Post by **Guest** » October 22nd, 2011, 1:47 am

+ they tell other labels about ur channel too this is so stupid man

jordesu · Post by **jordesu** » October 24th, 2011, 9:26 am

OH MY DAYS KITASHI I DIDN'T KNOW YOU FROM MANCHESTER THAT'S LIKE A FEW MILES FROM ME!
(つ^.^)つ

But yeah I was wiped out by Ipnotika, AATW and someone else but I can't remember.

Calan · Post by **Calan** » November 6th, 2011, 11:16 pm

I'm not Flareseeker, just a fan.

^ D:

Stupid no-name third parties! ):

Oil in Gulf · Post by **Oil in Gulf** » November 12th, 2011, 11:40 pm

I've heard that copyright strikes may expire after a few months, and I've heard stories of Youtube users having copyright strikes removed from their account.

But it probably won't happen to everyone. If you are lucky to have a copyright strike removed, great. But don't assume that a strike will automatically go away after a certain period of time.

Still be careful of what you nightcore and upload, and have a backup account just in case.

Post by **Kirby** » November 13th, 2011, 6:48 pm

I've never heard of copyright strikes getting removed, ever. You're probably referring to Community Guidelines strikes

Website · Post by **Johannez691** » November 15th, 2011, 12:43 pm

My second penalty:
"House - Walking On The Moon (Henrik B Remix)"
Original: Kris Menace - Walking On The Moon (Henrik B Remix)
Removed due to a copyright claim by "Wizard Records"

Oil in Gulf · Post by **Oil in Gulf** » November 19th, 2011, 6:47 pm

Kirby wrote:I've never heard of copyright strikes getting removed, ever. You're probably referring to Community Guidelines strikes

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/y ... 29bb&hl=en

Post by **Kirby** » November 19th, 2011, 8:11 pm

Somewhere in there I read "6 months". They're probably mistaking them as Community Guidelines strikes. Dozens of people have gotten suspended lately over the same old conditions that have always been set in stone. If this really is the case, then it certainly doesn't apply to anyone in the Nightcore/Trance or even the electronic community.

Oil in Gulf · Post by **Oil in Gulf** » November 20th, 2011, 2:29 am

Taken from Youtube's general policy enforcement page under the account strikes section:

A copyright strike may expire in 6 months, subject to certain conditions, as long as no additional copyright notifications are received during that time.

Post by **Kirby** » November 20th, 2011, 6:40 am

How about we stop until someone in the community claims that it happened to them, because absolutely no one in the history of this forum has EVER had their strikes removed. YouTube doesn't always keep their word either. Technically, you're not supposed to create additional accounts after being banned but no one has been punished for doing so.

Kitashi · Post by **Kitashi** » November 20th, 2011, 7:11 am

Oil In Gulf, I do see where you're coming from, but I see where Kirby is coming from as well. That tidbit in general policy enforcement has actually been up there for a pretty darn long amount of time. Pay close attention to MAY and SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS. Whatever those "certain conditions" are, no one in the music community has ever met them as far as I know. I know you mean well, but don't give people here false hope. :P

And just putting it out there. Copyright strikes being removed wouldn't make any legal sense. When DMCA takedowns are filed, YouTube enters a legally binding contract with the claimnant to remove the video off of site premises. Legalese doesn't have expiration dates. No criminal offense is any less illegal than it was 6 months back.

I would presume that the few people who have claimed to have their strikes removed were very special cases that YouTube reviewed individually. Meaning no dice for all the uploaders who actually do break the laws.

RobLucci · Post by **RobLucci** » November 24th, 2011, 6:35 am

The quest - C Sharp

DESUDESUDESU · Post by **DESUDESUDESU** » November 27th, 2011, 12:36 am

Wouldn't it be cool if we made a torrent of all the 'copyrighted'/DO NOT UPLOAD nightcore songs?

RaveComing · Post by **RaveComing** » November 27th, 2011, 12:57 am

DESUDESUDESU wrote:Wouldn't it be cool if we made a torrent of all the 'copyrighted'/DO NOT UPLOAD nightcore songs?

That would be 99.99% of all tracks ever made

Post by **appler** » November 27th, 2011, 1:27 am

RaveComing wrote:
DESUDESUDESU wrote:Wouldn't it be cool if we made a torrent of all the 'copyrighted'/DO NOT UPLOAD nightcore songs?
That would be 99.99% of all tracks ever made

Okay whos got the 5 petabytes of storage we would need for that lol :P

Post by **Kirby** » November 27th, 2011, 3:22 am

appler wrote:
RaveComing wrote:
DESUDESUDESU wrote:Wouldn't it be cool if we made a torrent of all the 'copyrighted'/DO NOT UPLOAD nightcore songs?
That would be 99.99% of all tracks ever made
Okay whos got the 5 petabytes of storage we would need for that lol :P

Just buy 5,000 WDs from Best Buy

slowfooted · Post by **slowfooted** » November 30th, 2011, 10:48 pm

Italobrothers - Boom ft. carlprit
I uploaded this and a radio edit, got a double account strike.

Website · Post by **Johannez691** » December 7th, 2011, 1:02 pm

Tiesto - Love Comes Again (Hardwell Remix) [Black Hole Recordings]
1st strike on the new channel.

Jedge · Post by **Jedge** » December 7th, 2011, 11:51 pm

A lot of new record labels have been popping up lately.
I've noticed that for older songs, they're now under labels that will give copyright strikes

I gave up on the whole idea of uploading many euro, american songs because I know that right behind it, theres a record label waiting to give a strike. Now I try to find tracks that are created solely by their owners and under cc license.

slowfooted · Post by **slowfooted** » December 8th, 2011, 3:54 pm

In my belief, American companies may take a while to file claims and ID matches. I have Pitbull's Rain Over Me on my channel, but no e-mails concerning yet.

Website · Post by **Raver** » December 18th, 2011, 4:25 pm

Panic Records / PANIK RECORDS

Moonightcore · Post by **Moonightcore** » December 27th, 2011, 1:28 pm

Munix, Airplay, Club Culture, Moonwalk

Website · Post by **Johannez691** » December 30th, 2011, 10:25 pm

Skrillex - Summit
Removed by Warner Music Group

Website · Post by **Johannez691** » January 6th, 2012, 11:09 pm

Artist: Tradelove
Title: Pum Back
Lable: Loudbit

Removed by Watch-Over, The anti piracy service.

Website · Post by **Johannez691** » February 5th, 2012, 5:51 am

Nightcore - Euphoria
Original: Loreen - Euphoria
Removed by SVT (Sveriges Television = Sweden's Television)

TechnoWolfie · Post by **TechnoWolfie** » February 9th, 2012, 5:37 pm

YouTube account VortexVK has been terminated because we received multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement from claimants including:

Mercury
Miradey
House Nation

Post by **appler** » February 10th, 2012, 8:02 pm

YES MUSIC AG, got a email in class stating that they removed Secret of love from my Channel

TechnoWolfie · Post by **TechnoWolfie** » February 11th, 2012, 1:37 am

I wonder if Nightcore has there own record Label